#Colloquy 2.1 code

Have submitted: savings for servicemembers to help lower the out-of. I would also add other amendments that should be considered that I Strongly support Senator Nelson's amendment. More fair for everyone? What are we doing about the oil giveaways? WhatДЄre we doing about the carried interest loophole? None of this is in Where is this Buffett rule that would make it Still don't know what exactly is in the final version of this bill. That is what we have to do.Д®ven though we appeared to be very close to voting on this bill, we What Senator Nelson's amendment smartly does is, it says: Let's goД«ack and actually have hearings. Middle class more than just a lump of debt in their stocking. To work with us on a bill that doesn't add this debt that gives the That group, someone has to govern, and this is their moment to govern, Tweets and going after this person and that person and this group and While the White House is busy sending out

This is your moment for our colleagues on the 1 reason why I am so concerned about this bill and why I stood withДЎ7 other Democrats, including Senator Nelson, just this last week and On the middle class and their kids and their grandkids, and that is the Now, whose shoulder is that going to be on? That debt is going to be The net is over a trillion dollars in debt. It does produce some economic growth, but guess They looked at this, and they said: Yes, it is about 1.4, When you consider that-and this is by the nonpartisan Joint Committee

This economic growth we are going to see. Now, our colleagues wereД¬laiming until yesterday, well, that is going to be offset with all Thing you notice for the middle class is that $1.4 trillion inДЄdditional debt comes out of this bill. In fact, when you look at the numbers, it is quite startling. Right now is that too much of it goes to the top. Meat and bread and butter-but also with their mortgages, with payingДЇor college, with everything they need to do. Proud cosponsor of, gets right to the meat of this, to the bread andД«utter, to helping the middle class with their groceries-since I used Is weighted much too heavily in terms of helping the wealthiest among Our problem with the bill that is on the floor right now is that it

#Colloquy 2.1 code

Proposition that is, that the Tax Code should be simpler. It is a very simple motion for a very simple Madam President, I thank Senator Nelson for his I am delighted to be joined by my colleague from Minnesota. Is where the revenue ought to be taken back from to give that revenue Someplace should be? It ought to be the huge corporate tax cuts. Offset those with revenue from someplace. Middle-class tax cuts permanent, and then get the Finance Committee to Go back to the Finance Committee, make the So this little motion simply says go back to the Finance CommitteeДЄnd correct this inequity. The very people who need the tax cuts that is, hard-working AmericanДЇamilies, the middle class. Huge corporate breaks at the same time it is giving modest breaks to

American jobs are lost while giving those Overseas, it is basically a zero tax rate, which is an incentive to go By the way, if the American corporation is doing business This tax bill, you want to give permanent, huge corporate cuts, from 35Дown to 20. Permanent, and in 7 or 8 years they cease to exist. Is permanent, but the modest, middle-class tax breaks are not It simply is, in this tax bill, theД¬orporate rate is reduced from 35 percent down to 20 percent, and that Madam President, the matter that is before the Senate is For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.ДЇrom the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT-CONTINUED Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., or ) or may be missing from this TXT display.